article_image

Is Italy’s €25 Per Night Tourist Tax the Solution to Overtourism?



Italy, one of the world’s most iconic tourist destinations, is once again grappling with the impacts of overtourism. The country, renowned for its rich history, art, and breathtaking landscapes, has been overwhelmed by millions of tourists yearly. In response, Italian officials are now considering a significant increase in tourist taxes, proposing to charge up to €25 per night in some hotel rooms. This move addresses the growing concerns of over-tourism and its effects on local communities, historical landmarks, and overall infrastructure.

What is the New Tourist Tax Proposal?

The proposed tourist tax is part of Italy’s broader effort to manage the challenges brought by mass tourism. Currently, visitors to many Italian cities already pay a local tourist tax ranging between €1 and €5 per night, depending on the city and the accommodation type. However, the national government is considering increasing this tax substantially for higher-end hotel rooms under the new proposal.

The proposed fees would be tiered, depending on the price of the room:

€25 per night for rooms costing €750 or more

€15 per night for rooms priced between €400 and €750

€10 per night for rooms between €100 and €400

€5 per night for rooms under €100

This tax would be in addition to any local tourist taxes already in place in cities like Venice, Rome, or Florence.


Photo: unsplash.com/ale_ranica

The rationale behind the tax increase is to combat a problem that Italy has struggled with for years. Venice, for example, has been at the center of this debate. The city has already experimented with various measures to control visitor numbers, such as the controversial “access contribution,” a fee that day-trippers must pay on peak tourist days. These measures aim to limit the strain that an overwhelming number of visitors can place on local infrastructure and reduce environmental damage to historical sites.

The proposed €25 per night tourist tax in Italy reflects the ongoing struggle to manage the impacts of overtourism. While the tax could provide much-needed revenue for preserving Italy’s rich cultural heritage and improving infrastructure, it also risks deterring tourists and harming the industry it seeks to protect.

Ultimately, the success of such a tax will depend on how it is implemented and whether the funds benefit visitors and the local communities directly affected by tourism. As Italy progresses with this proposal, it must carefully consider the balance between promoting sustainable tourism and maintaining its appeal as one of the world’s top travel destinations.